Recently, the outcomes of the third web-based survey open to chemists from all countries (ESEC3) were published (open access) in Chemistry – A European Journal, addressing careers of chemistry graduates and diversity in the chemical workforce.
The third Employment Survey for European Chemists (ESEC3) was conducted by EuChemS, with support from ECTN, FECCIA and ACS, aiming at capturing detailed data about the professional lives of chemists. I would like to thank Nineta Hrastelj, EuChemS Secretary General, for the great efforts in setting up the survey in collaboration with all the stakeholders and for the successful organization of its implementation as well as Reiner Salzer for taking the lead in the interpretation of the responses received.
Surveys on the early career chemists are crucial for several reasons:
Understanding the various pathways that early career chemists take can highlight emerging trends in the field, the diverse opportunities available and the specific challenges. These insights can guide institutions and policymakers in addressing these issues effectively.
By identifying gaps between the skills taught in educational institutions and those required in the industry, surveys can help shape curriculum development to better prepare students for their careers.
Insights from surveys can highlight the need for ongoing professional development and training, ensuring that chemists remain competitive and up to date with the latest advancements and technologies.
Data from surveys can inform policymakers about the needs and concerns of early career chemists, leading to more targeted and effective policies.
Surveys can uncover disparities related to gender, ethnicity, and other demographic factors, prompting initiatives to promote diversity and inclusion within the field.
Several surveys have been conducted by other chemical societies as well, such as the Royal Society of Chemistry and American Chemical Society. I hope that the next survey, ESEC4, which will start next year, can be jointly launched by all the chemical societies, at least at a European level, to avoid unnecessary duplications in the requests to fill in the questionnaires, possibly encouraging the greatest number of responses. In addition, a unique questionnaire on a regular basis would allow a correct comparison of the situation of chemists in different geographical areas, providing an opportunity for benchmarking against previous data, helping to track progress over time and measure the impact of implemented changes. Overall, these surveys are essential tools for understanding the current landscape of the chemistry profession and to foster a robust and inclusive scientific community.
